Indian Brokers Affected by SEBI's New Fee Regulation
A significant move by SEBI disrupts the brokerage industry in India, mandating stock exchanges to levy uniform charges on brokers, shaking the financial landscape.
Published July 03, 2024 - 00:07am

Image recovered from deccanherald.com
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has introduced a landmark regulation that will transform the brokerage landscape across India. Effective from October 1, 2023, this directive mandates stock exchanges and other market infrastructure institutions (MIIs) to levy uniform charges on brokers, regardless of the volume of trades they handle. This uniform fee approach has sent ripples across the financial markets, leading to considerable fluctuations in the share prices of Indian brokerage firms.
Shares of major brokerages such as Angel One, 5Paisa Capital, SMC Global Securities, Motilal Oswal, Geojit Financial, and Dolat Algotech fell between 3% and 8% in early trade following the announcement. Notably, Angel One, the largest publicly listed brokerage by clients, experienced a massive share price decline of up to 11%. Additionally, IIFL Securities Ltd. and 5Paisa Capital Ltd. each dropped by at least 5%.
Historically, large brokers benefitted from lower transaction fees because exchanges provided discounts based on the volume of transactions. This tiered fee structure, according to SEBI, provided an unfair advantage to high-volume brokers while putting smaller firms at a disadvantage. The new regulation aims to level the playing field, creating a more equitable environment for all brokers.
Amit Kumar Gupta, Chief Investment Officer at Fintrekk Capital in New Delhi, pointed out the substantial impacts of this new regulation. He indicated that while the tiered structure's end might erode sales and profitability for brokers with heavy volumes, smaller brokers could potentially benefit from reduced competition from their larger counterparts.
The new rules come at a time when derivative trading, particularly among retail investors, has been surging. SEBI has raised concerns over the increasing risks associated with this rise, especially due to small investors engaging in risky options contracts. In light of these concerns, SEBI's move to standardize charges across the board appears to be an effort to curb excessive speculative trading and enhance market stability.
Tejas Khoday, CEO of discount broker FYERS, expressed apprehension about the ramifications for discount brokers, for whom exchange fees constitute a significant portion of revenue—exceeding 50% in some cases. The changes might compel these firms to reevaluate their business models and strategies, given the substantial revenue impact.
The impact of SEBI's directive is evident not only in the stock prices of these brokerage firms but also in the broader market dynamics. Despite the year-long growth of Indian brokerage shares—some rising between 50-124% due to increased trading activities—the imposition of uniform fees adds a new layer of complexity and potential volatility.
In contrast to the buoyant performance of the Nifty 50 and S&P BSE Sensex, which have been hovering near record highs, the brokerage sector is poised for a period of recalibration. Dolat Algotech, one of the leading performers with a 124% gain in its stock price this year, now faces a challenging regulatory environment that could undermine its impressive growth.
The directive also has potential implications for clients and their trading strategies. Brokers, who once passed through their lower costs to clients, might now adjust fees reflecting the new uniform charges, potentially making trading more expensive for retail investors. This change could drive a shift in trading volumes and strategies, particularly affecting those heavily invested in derivative trading.
SEBI's mandate is not an isolated attempt to regulate the financial market; it follows a series of measures over recent years aimed at increasing transparency and reducing systemic risks. For instance, the restrictions on leverages on intraday trading introduced in 2020 to curb excessive speculative activities among investors set a precedent for this latest regulatory move.
Aside from brokers, stock exchanges like the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), which saw a 2.5% drop in its stock price, and other MIIs are also adjusting to the new fee structure. Although the long-term effects remain uncertain, the immediate response from the markets underscores industry-wide apprehensions about profitability and sustainable business operations.
Nithin Kamath, the founder of Zerodha, India's largest stockbroker by active clients, highlighted the significant role of rebates in their business model. Rebates, essentially the difference between transaction fees paid by clients and the lower fees paid to exchanges due to high turnover, have traditionally been a revenue generator. With the new regulations erasing this differential, brokers will lose a vital income stream, compelling a rethink of their pricing strategies and operational efficiencies.
Moreover, the new circular aligns with SEBI's broader efforts to enhance market health and security. By establishing a uniform fee structure, SEBI aims to mitigate the risk of excessive speculation driven by fee-based incentives, thereby fostering a more stable trading environment. A working group has been set up by the board to further investigate and address the dramatic rise in retail participation in options trading, signaling SEBI's ongoing commitment to comprehensive market oversight.
As the October 1 deadline nears, the industry is preparing for significant adjustments. Analysts predict that the reshaped fee structures could lead to industry consolidation, with smaller brokers becoming more competitive while larger brokers may need to innovate to maintain their market share.
In summary, SEBI's directive to impose uniform charges on broker transactions marks a pivotal moment in India's financial regulatory landscape. While it aims to ensure fairness and market stability, the immediate fallout, as seen in the share price drops and industry concerns, suggests a period of transition and adaptation for brokers, exchanges, and investors alike. Whether this move will ultimately lead to a healthier market ecosystem remains to be seen, but its significance is indisputable.