The recent ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has put a temporary pause on the prolonged conflict that has left Gaza in an apparent state of ruin. After 15 months of devastating warfare, the ceasefire begins amidst scenes reminiscent of apocalyptic devastation, with entire cities converted into ghost towns.

In Gaza, drone images capture sprawling wreckage, visual testament to what many call the longest and most lethal confrontation between Israel and Hamas. As the dust temporarily settles, critics unsparingly describe the situation as a scorched-earth campaign that has severely impacted civilian life, triggering investigations at international courts.

While Israel defends its military strategy as necessary in the cramped urban territory, the scale of destruction has prompted allegations of potential war crimes from human rights organizations. The approach, staring from air assaults to ground invasions, has turned once vibrantly populated areas into monochrome landscapes of rubble.

The strategic dismantling of Hamas' network of tunnels is one key aspect contributing to the wide-ranging destruction. Troops often leveled structures suspected of harboring militants, further destabilizing the precarious lived infrastructures in Gaza, composed of vital public utilities like hospitals and schools. Notably, Israeli military operations annihilated parts of Gaza's urban and rural settings to establish secure buffer zones for operations.

The widespread obliteration, which displaced 90% of Gaza's population, stands at an estimated recovery timeline extending beyond decades, drawing fences between humanitarian assistance and the logistical nightmare of reconstruction clouds.

Intensifying these challenging humanitarian corridors is the political dimension rife with turbulence, as illustrated by recent political resignations in Israel. This move underscores poignant criticism and the dynamic political compactness governing such fragile pacts.

This intricate military and political scenario comes alongside brewing outrage and discontent, prevalent amongst segments of Israel's government coalition, sparking resignations, and internal disagreements over peace tactics and military operations.

In the muddy waters of strategic political calculus, controversies swirl over commitments and positions Israel has adopted towards any potential realignment of territory or political authority in Palestinian regions. The peace's longevity remains delicate, encumbered by Israel's military maneuvering and Hamas' entrenched tensions, forming an uneasy tripod of tactical, humanitarian, and political complexities at the heart of Middle Eastern geopolitics.