The political stage is set for an enthralling encounter as former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden have unanimously agreed to conduct two pivotal debates in the coming months. These events are slated for June 27 and September 10, with the first to be held at CNN's Atlanta studios and the second at ABC, both without any audience present. This bold move departs from the tradition of debates organized by the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates, which has been sidelined this election cycle amidst contentions from both campaigns.

The correspondence between the two leaders has been public and intense, each challenging the other with assured confidence of their victory in the erstwhile match-ups and readiness for the new ones. Despite this agreement, there remains a smattering of unresolved issues, from the inclusion of third-party candidates to decisions about moderators and debate rules. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a potential third-party participant, has challenged his exclusion, claiming it undermines democracy and the public's desire for more than a two-party perspective.

Both campaigns have voiced dissatisfaction with the Commission on Presidential Debates for past grievances and are now charting a new course for the debates to take – one that focuses solely on the interests of voters in a television studio setting, harking back to the original televised debates in 1960. Trump's campaign is advocating for more debates and larger venues, despite Biden's call for a pared-down approach, centering on clear, uninterrupted dialogue.

As early as Wednesday morning, Trump suggested a debate location outside the Manhattan courthouse where he is on trial, showcasing his characteristic bravado in campaign matters. Both candidates have agreed to face off after significant events: Trump after his criminal trial and Biden after the G7 summit, ensuring a political spectacle that will potentially shape the pre-voting period. The sparring has also spilled onto social media, where both candidates have continued to taunt each other, adding fuel to an already fiery political environment.

The two debates represent a significant departure from the norm, signaling a potentially transformative moment in American political discourse. Experts suggest that the direct negotiation between the Trump and Biden camps could lead to more tailored discussions aimed at addressing the critical concerns of the day. For the electorate, this could mean a deeper insight into policies and leadership styles, as contrasted with the often broad-strokes approach seen in more traditionally structured debates.

Despite the agreement on debate venues and dates, the negotiations leading up to the debates were fraught with political posturing. Behind-the-scenes discussions were said to be intense, with both teams seeking every possible advantage. The Trump team's insistence on more debates hints at a strategy to leverage the former President's renowned stage presence and quick-fire retorts, while Biden's preference for a controlled environment suggests a focus on detailed policy exposition.

Election analysts see these debates as possible turning points in a tight race. Public anticipation is growing, reflecting the heightened interest in what many see as a battle not just between two political figureheads, but between conflicting visions for America's future. As campaign strategies are honed and messages sharpened, these face-to-face meetings will provide voters with a clear contrast in policies and leadership philosophies.

The decision to forego a live audience is another unconventional element of the upcoming debates. This decision is likely to change the dynamics of the events, allowing for more substantive discussions without the influence of crowd reactions. On one hand, it minimizes distractions for the candidates, but on the other, it removes the immediate feedback loop that public reactions can provide. It is a gamble that both sides seem willing to take, prioritizing the conveyance of their messages in what they believe will be a purer form.

The exclusion of third-party candidates has been a recurring controversy in presidential debates. Advocates for a more inclusive debate format argue that it offers a broader range of viewpoints and better reflects a democracy that consists of multiple political perspectives. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s stance resonates with those who feel marginalized by the traditional two-party system, and his challenge has ignited a discussion about the democratic process and representation.

Questions regarding the debate moderators and exact rules have yet to be answered, lending an air of uncertainty to the proceedings. The respective campaigns will likely be looking for moderators who can ensure fairness and absence of bias, managing the debates in a way that allows the candidates to articulate their visions for the country without resorting to political theatrics.

In the interim, the political machinery on both sides will continue to grind away. Preparations will intensify as the debate dates draw near, with each candidate honing their rhetoric to present themselves as the leader best equipped to steer the nation forward. With the sparring between Trump and Biden intensifying on social media, it appears that the months leading up to these unique debates will be as contentious and newsworthy as the events themselves.

As the United States and indeed the world watch with bated breath, the outcomes of these debates have the potential to sway undecided voters and solidify support amongst party loyalists. The implications for the November elections are immense, with these debates possibly marking critical moments in the quest for the presidency. In an increasingly polarized political climate, these debates are not only about winning arguments but also about winning hearts and minds across America and setting the course for the country's future.