Judge Blocks Trump from Using Isaac Hayes' Iconic Song

A federal judge has ruled against Trump's use of Isaac Hayes' 'Hold On (I'm Coming)' at rallies, stirring debates on music rights and political usage.

Published September 04, 2024 - 00:09am

3 minutes read
United States
https://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Isaac-Hayes-Donald-Trump.jpeg

Image recovered from thewrap.com

A federal judge has temporarily blocked former President Donald Trump from using music legend Isaac Hayes' hit song Hold On (I'm Coming) in campaign rallies. This move comes as a response to a lawsuit filed by Hayes' estate, which has demanded $3 million for the unauthorized use of the track.

The decision, handed down by Judge Thomas Thrash Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, highlights the ongoing legal battle over music rights in political campaigns. Trump's campaign, having used the song more than 130 times since 2022, has been ordered to cease its use. However, the campaign is not required to remove any existing videos featuring the song.

Isaac Hayes III, the son of the late artist, expressed his satisfaction with the ruling, stating, I couldn't ask for a better decision. I want this to serve as an opportunity for other artists to come forward that don't want their music used by Donald Trump or other political entities. The estate's legal team, led by James L. Walker Jr., echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the importance of protecting Hayes' legacy and artistic rights.

The Trump campaign's attorney, Ronald Coleman, confirmed that they had already agreed to stop using the song prior to the ruling. He noted, We're very gratified that the court recognized the First Amendment issues at stake and didn't order a takedown of existing videos.

The legal contention began when the Hayes estate sent a cease-and-desist letter to Trump's team on August 11, demanding immediate cessation of the song's use and a $3 million fee. This figure was described as a very discounted fee, considering the standard rate of $150,000 per use, which could accumulate to a significantly higher amount if litigated.

This case is not an isolated incident. Several high-profile artists, including Beyonce, Foo Fighters, and Celine Dion, have previously objected to the use of their music by Trump. This ongoing tension underscores the complexities and legal nuances of music rights when intersecting with political campaigns.

The use of Hold On (I'm Coming) at Trump's rallies, often played at the end of events as he danced, has drawn significant attention. The song, written by Isaac Hayes and David Porter and recorded by Sam & Dave in 1966, is an R&B classic that has endured over the decades. Its historical and cultural significance, particularly as part of the Civil Rights Movement soundtrack, adds another layer of sensitivity to its unauthorized use.

In court documents, the Hayes estate argued that the song's association with Trump could potentially damage its licensing value, deterring sponsors and brands from using it. This concern is particularly poignant given the song's rich legacy and frequent licensing for various media purposes.

As the lawsuit progresses, the broader implications for political campaigns and music rights become evident. Artists' control over how their work is used, especially in highly public and politicized contexts, remains a contentious and evolving issue.

Sources

How would you rate this article?

What to read next...